Thursday, August 25, 2011

Print Design Vs Screen Design

As current technology advances, individual also advances from gaining information from print-based document to screen-based documents. Screen-based documents are informations in websites that have picture, movements, audio and hyperlinks as compared to print-based documents that consists of text and a few pictures as illustration. According to Walsh (2006) there are a few consideration considerations that when designing for screen versus print documents. The 3 considerations I will mention about is 

1. Principal mode
For print-based documents, the principal mode is the words that tell, and the arrangements of chapters, paragraphs and sentence whereas for screen-based documents includes visual image, graphics and audio, hyperlinks and frames.

2. Interpersonal meaning
Print-based documents interpersonal meaning is developed through verbal voice which uses narrators whereas screen-based documents is developed through visual voice such as positioning, angle, and sound.


3. Reading pathway
For print-based documents, readers reads and follow the text in sequence. The reading pathway for screen-based documents use less sequence and mostly based on the readers interest and choice to interact. 
According to Hall, Larson & Marsh (2003), states that especially in childhood education, screen-based text has been effective in the addition to theories and practice of literacy teaching and learning. 
An example of print-based documents


An example of screen-based documents

As shown in the above pictures, the print-based documents contains only text and wordy which makes individuals not willing to read. However for screen-based documents, readers or users of the site might be interested to stay longer in this site because this site is much more interesting. Readers of screen-based documents can click on the hyperlinks based on their interests whereas readers of books containing text only can read in sequence.
(291 words)
References
Walsh, M 2006, Textual Shift: Examining the Reading Process with Print, Visual and Multimodal texts, Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, vol.29, no.1, p.24-37.



No comments:

Post a Comment